Columbia Plays Dirty Pool

25 October 2005 Columbia Spectator column "Columbia Plays Dirty Pool" by John Mateus.  Note:  A Columbia Law student calls interference with military interviews, which blocked him from being interviewed, "underhanded and sabotage" and criticizes the unwillingness of Columbia to stop the interference.  See also responses by Karyn Lukoff, Michelle Rutherford and Cuauhtemoc Ortega.

Columbia University Senate "Minutes of September 16, 2005"

21 October 2005 Columbia University Senate "Minutes of September 16, 2005".  Note:  Senator Paul Duby reported on the discussions at the June Columbia University Trustees meeting about the ROTC issue.  When "a Trustee asked if there was anything else the Trustees were expected to do on this subject; Sen. Duby said Provost Alan Brinkley answered in one word: No".  The minutes also note that "the Task Force made some recommendations for improving conditions for Columbia students who are pursuing ROTC off campus, at Manhattan College or Fordham. One was to provide more assistance in the form of transportation, or maybe a small office on the Columbia campus. Another was to assure that any students barred from ROTC because of their sexual preference would be eligible for equivalent financial support from Columbia. Sen. Duby said he and Sen. Applegate would discuss these issues with the provost."

Hypocrisy 101: The Academy and Military Recruiters

12 October 2005 American Council of Trustees and Alumni press release "Hypocrisy 101: The Academy and Military Recruiters".  Note:  ACTA lists the federal funds at risk under the Solomon Amendment.  Of the listed colleges barring ROTC, Columbia leads with $457 million at risk

Anti-Military Sentiments Persist on Elite Campus

September 2005 VFW Magazine article "Anti-Military Sentiments Persist on Elite Campus".  Note: Many of the leaders of the Columbia effort were quoted, including Advocates for Columbia ROTC chairman Sean Wilkes and alumni group Columbia Alliance for ROTC chairman Ted Graske CC'59.

Universities and the Military: What You Should Know About the Upcoming Supreme Court Case

August 2005 American Council of Trustees and alumni article "Universities and the Military: What You Should Know About the Upcoming Supreme Court Case" by Melvin H. Bernstein.  Note:  The article recounts the history of the Solomon Amendment and compares the attitude of the presidents of Harvard and Columbia towards ROTC.

Honor thy soldiers

30 May 2005 Washington Times column "Honor thy soldiers" by Suzanne Fields.  Note:  Fields discusses the University Senate vote against ROTC at Columbia and quotes Harvard President Lawrence Summers as saying that military service is "vitally important to the freedom that makes possible institutions like Harvard".

Columbia's 'Compromising' Exactly What Principles?

26 May 2005 Wall Street Journal letter "Columbia's 'Compromising' Exactly What Principles?" by Irving Louis Horowitz.  Note:  Prof. Horowitz responds to President Bollinger's letter about the editorial on ROTC at Columbia.

Columbia's old elite a new ROTC enemy

23 May 2005 New York Daily News column "Columbia's old elite a new ROTC enemy" by Shane Hachey.  Note:  The submitted text is here.

U.S. Supreme Court Will Review Law that Denies Funding to Campuses that Bar Military

23 May 2005 Voice of America story "U.S. Supreme Court Will Review Law that Denies Funding to Campuses that Bar Military".  Note:  Columbia University student Scott Stewart, a gay veteran who supports ROTC on campus, says you have to associate with the military to influence it.

Columbia declares war on ROTC

20 May 2005 New York Daily News editorial "Columbia declares war on ROTC".

Wisdom of Solomon

19 May 2005 New York Sun editorial "Wisdom of Solomon".  Note:  The Sun calls for the trustees of Columbia to restore ROTC and notes that "many of those most committed to pressing the government to change its policy toward gays in the military are those asking that Columbia open its doors to ROTC."  For examples, see the Columbia University Senate Task Force Report, this email discussion and this proposal for immediate changes in the law.

ROTC Debate Not Over at Columbia

19 May 2005 Inside Higher Ed article "ROTC Debate Not Over at Columbia".  Note:  The board of trustees will meet on 4 June and "has invited Senate representatives from both sides of the debate to answer questions on that, and a host of other issues". 

Columbia To Consider Bringing ROTC Back to Campus

18 May 2005 New York Sun article "Columbia To Consider Bringing ROTC Back to Campus".  Note:  The chairman of the board of trustees, David Stern, said he is pushing to the forefront of the board's agenda the issue of the university's policy toward ROTC.

Denying Students ROTC

18 May 2005 Wall Street Journal letter "Denying Students ROTC" by David Thomas.  Note:  Responding to Prof. Cohen's article on 13 May, Thomas states that "denying students exposure to ROTC and military history is as short-sighted as eliminating, say, women's studies."

Columbia, ROTC and Sexual Orientation

17 May 2005 Wall Street Journal letter "Columbia, ROTC and Sexual Orientation" by President Lee C. Bollinger (also on Columbia's Web site).  Note:  Responding to an editorial, Pres. Bollinger writes "After acknowledging that reasonable people can differ over the military's prohibition on openly gay and lesbian servicemen and women, the editorial goes on to suggest that those of us who disagree with that prohibition are anti-military, and to question our motivations."  However, this is not an accurate portrayal of the debate at Columbia.  As the Columbia ROTC Task Force report makes clear, proponents of the return of ROTC to Columbia also opposed "Don't ask, don't tell".  The disagreement between pro and anti-ROTC sides at Columbia was whether the benefits of ROTC outweighed the disagreements with the federal law.  Pres. Bollinger went on to blame the government for putting an end to the discussion about ROTC at Columbia, noting that his vote against return of ROTC "was based on a serious concern for the integrity of the university in the face of the federal government's use of the power of the purse to force institutions to compromise their principles".  However, the best indications of Pentagon intentions available before the vote were that "the Pentagon cannot provide a positive request or indication to Columbia to reestablish an ROTC unit on campus because, to do so, would trigger the Solomon Amendment should Columbia turn down the request".  See also a letter in response on 26 May.

Fossella: Federal Money at Risk For Columbia

16 May 2005 New York Sun article "Fossella: Federal Money at Risk For Columbia".  Note:  A New York City congressman suggests that the Secretary of Defense could invoke the Solomon Amendment over Columbia's rejection of ROTC.

Neither Fools Nor Cowards: Barriers between military service and higher education do a disservice to both

13 May 2005 Wall Street Journal column "Neither Fools Nor Cowards: Barriers between military service and higher education do a disservice to both" by Eliot A. Cohen.  Note:  Prof. Cohen discusses the civilian-military divide in light of Columbia's rejection of ROTC and the fact that "the institutional military is not all that eager to re-establish a ROTC presence on elite campuses".  See letter in response on 18 May.  Prof. Cohen, a Harvard ROTC graduate, is pictured here at his son's Harvard ROTC commissioning.

The Wisdom of Solomon

13 May 2005 Villainous Company blog item "The Wisdom of Solomon".  Note:  Cassandra discusses the University Senate vote against ROTC at Columbia and argues that using the Solomon Amendment for ROTC removes the argument that universities with ROTC are tacitly expressing approval for the "Don't ask, don't tell" law.

A Tale of Two Columbias: The patriotic and the politically correct

11 May 2005 Wall Street Journal editorial "A Tale of Two Columbias: The patriotic and the politically correct".  Note:  See responses on 17 May and 26 May.

Reserve Officer Training Corps: After Semester of Debate, ROTC To Stay Off Campus

9 May 2005 Columbia Spectator article "Reserve Officer Training Corps: After Semester of Debate, ROTC To Stay Off Campus".

AWOL at Columbia

9 May 2005 New York Sun editorial "AWOL at Columbia".  Note:  The Sun notes "the lack of protest of the policies of the Islamist enemy in respect of gay rights" at Columbia and argues that one is not "helping the causes of tolerance or civil rights by staying on the sidelines of this war".

Columbia Says No, Still, to ROTC

9 May 2005 Inside Higher Ed article "Columbia Says No, Still, to ROTC".

University Senate Says No to ROTC

Spring 2005 Columbia magazine article "University Senate Says No to ROTC".  Note:  Although the Senate vote was not binding "the administration has pledged to respect the vote".  Nate Walker '08TC, who co-chaired the ROTC Task Force, said "It's clear to me, from my work on the senate, that when the military stops its invidious discriminatory practices, Columbia probably will support ROTC's return", referring to the "Don't ask, don't tell" law.  Provost Alan Brinkley, who abstained from voting as is his custom, despite an impassioned anti-ROTC speech, said "there does not seem to be strong intrinsic opposition toward the military, other than with regard to this discriminatory policy".

The Professor Who Abolished ROTC

14 April 2004 Columbia Spectator article "The Professor Who Abolished ROTC From Columbia". Note: Prof. Lewis Cole says he opposes university credit for courses about the practice of war, but supports credit for courses about military theory.

Congress Pressures Colleges to Accept Military Recruiters

9 April 2004 Columbia Spectator article "Congress Pressures Colleges to Accept Military Recruiters".

Spectator Letter to the Editor

8 April 2004 Columbia Spectator letter "Racism and Homophobia in ROTC Violate Columbia's Standards of Tolerance" by Joya Banerjee, BC '04

Possible Return of ROTC

1 April 2004 Columbia Spectator article "Possible Return of ROTC to Campus Sparks Controversy". Note: "I think everybody involved with the proposal is perfectly aware that the law governing participation in the military has to change, and we will be part of that change if we can," said professor of finance and economics Michael Adler, one of the proposal's faculty supporters.

Senate Passes ROTC Task Force

29 March 2004 Columbia Spectator article "Senate Passes ROTC Task Force". Note: Columbia is setting up a committee to look into the restoration of ROTC.

University Senate Minutes

26 March 2004 Columbia University Senate minutes "Proposal to bring ROTC back to Columbia".

Proposal to Return ROTC to Columbia’s Campus

21 March 2004 "Brief: Proposal to Return ROTC to Columbia’s Campus" by Advocates for Columbia ROTC and Students United for America. Note: The document is also on the Web site of the Columbia University Senate.

Letter to Provost Alan Brinkley

17 February 2004 Letter to Columbia Provost Alan Brinkley "Restoration of ROTC" from Admiral B. James Lowe CC'51. Note: Admiral Lowe mentions a commitment from Provost Brinkley "to form a committee from the faculty senate to review the advantages and disadvantages that would be derived from restoration of the ROTC to Columbia".

Spectator Letter to the Editor

14 February 2004 Columbia Spectator letter "Articles Fail to Accurately Cover Campus ROTC Debate" by Shane Hachey, GS '04.

Spectator Letter to the Editor

14 February 2004 Columbia Spectator letter "CU Should Support Student Participation in the Military" by Jeff Sult, TC '03.

Columbia: Letter to the Editor

6 February 2004 Columbia Spectator letter "ROTC Trains Its Members to Be Leaders of Society, Not Just Killers" by James Bondarchuk, CC '05.

Columbia: Spectator Letter to the Editor

5 February 2004 Columbia Spectator letter "Bringing ROTC to Columbia Will Not Reform the Armed Services" by Michael Castleman, SEAS '03.

Columbia: Spectator "ROTC Return Proposals Provoke Activist Criticism"

3 February 2004 Columbia Spectator article "ROTC Return Proposals Provoke Activist Criticism". Note: President Bollinger "made clear that any reinstatement of ROTC will have to begin at the student level, not the administrative level."

Columbia: Spectator Editorial "Bring Back ROTC"

3 February 2004 Columbia Spectator editorial "Bring Back ROTC". Note: Columbia's student newspaper calls for the return of ROTC based on the importance of integrating the military with society and ensuring a diversity of views on campus.

Columbia: Website Addition

2 February 2004 Columbia University "Grants and Scholarships from Sources Other than Columbia". Note: Columbia adds information about financial support from ROTC to its financial aid Web site.

Columbia: Spectator "ROTC Marches Back to Columbia"

27 January 2004 Columbia Spectator article "ROTC Marches Back to Columbia: New Web Site, Registration Credit Give ROTC Supporters Hope for Program at CU".

Columbia: ACR Press Release

21 January 2004 Advocates for Columbia ROTC press release "Columbia University and ROTC". Note: Columbia now offers information about ROTC on its Web site and will list ROTC courses on student transcripts.

Defense Business Board on Implementing ROTC Programs at Top Tier Schools

20 November 2003 Defense Business Practice Implementation Board meeting minutes. Note: The participants in the Defense Business Board meeting discussed "implementing ROTC programs at top tier schools". Dov Zakheim mentioned the effort to restore ROTC at Columbia and said "I spoke to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and he is extremely interested ... We would like to get on the campus at Harvard. The President of Harvard has showed an interest in this." Bill Carr raised the possibility of restoring ROTC at Yale, citing the difficulty of Yale students traveling to ROTC programs at other colleges. He also discussed the tradeoff between getting top tier cadets and paying the high cost of ROTC scholarships to top tier schools. The group recommended to "approach Harvard's President first and if successful, then approach Yale, Columbia and Brown".

Columbia: FrontPage Magazine

9 May 2003 FrontPage Magazine column "Graduation Present: It's Not 1968 at Columbia Anymore" by Ron Lewenberg.

Columbia: WSJ Best of the Web Today

21 April 2003 Wall Street Journal Best of the Web Today "Harvard Hangups" by James Taranto. Comment: Taranto notes the 973 to 530 student vote for ROTC at Columbia and observes how times have changed.

Columbia: Spectator "High Turnout Decides CC Student Council Election"

17 April 2003 Columbia Spectator article "High Turnout Decides CC Student Council Election". Comment: Towards the end of the article is results from "a referendum asking if the University should prohibit the ROTC from having a chapter at Columbia". By a vote of 973 to 530, students favored allowing ROTC. The students do not have an official say in the decision.

Columbia: Spectator Letter to the Editor

10 April 2003 Columbia Spectator letter "ROTC Program Would be Valuable to Columbia Community" by Eric Chen. Note: This is a response to the 8 April Pulizzi column.

Columbia: Spectator "Don't Question or Doubt the ROTC"

8 April 2003 Columbia Spectator column "Don't Question or Doubt the ROTC" by James Pulizzi. Note: See response letter on 10 April.

Columbia: Spectator Letter to the Editor

8 April 2003 Columbia Spectator letter "ROTC at Ivy League Will Improve Diversity of Military" by Sean Wilkes CC '06.

Columbia: NYT "Professors Protest as Students Debate"

5 April 2003 New York Times article "Professors Protest as Students Debate". Comment: The article mentions the effort to restore ROTC at Columbia and the response to ROTC at Princeton. "When Gary J. Bass, an assistant professor of politics at Princeton, asked his class on "Causes of War" how many students were in R.O.T.C., two raised their hands. The rest applauded."

Columbia: Specttor "Military Intelligence"

3 April 2003 Columbia Spectator column "Military Intelligence" by Brian Wagner. Comment: Wagner dissects the anti-ROTC arguments made at a Columbia College forum.

Columbia: NYT "Future Soldier, Life on a Liberal Campus"

2 April 2003 New York Times article "For a Future Soldier, Life on a Liberal Campus Can Be a Battle".